Evaluation of positive and false-positive results in syphilis screening of blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Transfusion Medicine
Abstract
Objectives: We propose to analyse the positive and
false-positive results of treponemal and nontreponemal tests
in blood donors from Brazil and to evaluate possible factors
associated with the results of treponemal tests.
Background: Treponemal tests have been used widely for
syphilis screening in blood banks. The introduction of these
tests in donor screening has caused an impact and a loss of
donors who need to be assessed.
Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of
syphilis screening and confirmatory test results of blood donors
that were obtained before and after adopting a chemiluminescent
immunoassay (CLIA). A comparative analysis was performed
using a second sample drawn from positive donors. The possible
factors associated with CLIA-positive or CLIA-false-positive
results were investigated in a subgroup. Statistical tests were
used to compare the proportions and adjusted estimates of
association.
Results: The reactivity rate increased from 1·01% (N =28 158)
to 2·66% (N =25 577) after introducing the new test.
Among Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL)- and
CLIA-confirmed results, the false-positive rates were 40·5%
(N =180) and 37·4% (N =359), respectively (P =0·5266). Older
donors (OR = 1·04; P =0·0010) and donors with lower education levels (OR = 6·59; P =0·0029) were associated with a
higher risk of positivity for syphilis.
Conclusions: CLIA represents an improvement in blood bank
serological screening. However, its use in a healthy population
appears to result in high rates of false positives. Identifying which
characteristics can predict false positives, however, remains a
challenge.
Description
p. 200–206.: tab. p&b.
Citation
CASTILHO, Selma Rodrigues de et al. Evaluation of positive and false-positive results in syphilis screening of blood donors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Transfusion Medicine, v. 27, p. 200–206, 2017.