Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend

dc.TypeArticlept_BR
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Andreia Cristina de
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Clymene de Souza Hartung
dc.contributor.authorMora, Paulo Alexandre Ribeiro
dc.contributor.authorPaulino, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Guillermo Coca
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Ana Paula Vieira dos Santos
dc.contributor.authorAmim Junior, Joffre
dc.contributor.authorElias, Kevin
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, Neil
dc.contributor.authorBerkowitz, Ross Stuart
dc.contributor.authorRezende Filho, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T18:36:22Z
dc.date.available2021-12-15T18:36:22Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.descriptionp. 598–605.: tab. p&b.
dc.description.abstractTo compare the outcomes of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) treated with standard 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) versus modified regimen. Methods. Retrospective cohort study of patients with low-risk GTN followed at Rio de Janeiro Federal Univer sity, from January/1990-December/2017 with standard 8-day MTX/FA or modified regimen (MTX administered on the 8th day rather than 7th) to avoid treatment on the weekend. Results. From 937 patients with low-risk GTN, 538 were treated with standard MTX/FA and 98 patients re ceived modified regimen. Both groups were comparable in age (p = .749), antecedent pregnancy (p = .221), time to initiate chemotherapy (p = .926), hCG pretreatment level (p = .112) and WHO/FIGO prognostic risk score (p = .723). Patients treated with modified MTX/FA had twice of cases of metastatic lung disease compared with the standard regimen (22.5% vs 10.6%; p = .002). The rate of remission (p = .999), number of cycles to re mission in the first-line (p = .966), chemoresistance (p = .500), time to switch to second-line therapy (p = .176), need for multiagent chemotherapy (p = .084), relapse (p = .122) or death (p = .475) was the same for both MTX/FA regimen. However, although patients receiving modified MTX/FA required a higher total number of remission cycles (6 vs 5 cycles; p = .004) and longer time to remission (19 vs 16 weeks; p b .001) when com pared with the standard regimen, these variables showed no significant differences after multivariate logistic re gression adjusted for lung metastasis. Conclusion. The modified 8-day MTX/FA regimen didn't compromise oncologic outcomes for women with low-risk GTN. This regimen appears to be an acceptable alternative to standard 8-day MTX/FA when treatment on weekend isn't an option.
dc.identifier.citationMELO, Andreia Cristina de et al. Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 156, p. 598–605, 2020.
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4792
dc.publisherGynecologic Oncologypt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos de Casos e Controlespt_BR
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiespt_BR
dc.subjectTratamento Farmacológicopt_BR
dc.subjectDrug Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectOrganismos Geneticamente Modificadospt_BR
dc.subjectOrganisms, Genetically Modifiedpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekendpt_BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of treatment for low-risk .pdf
Size:
593.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: