A randomised controlled trial of periconal eye blockade with orwithout ultrasound guidance

dc.TypeArticlept_BR
dc.contributor.authorNascimento Junior, Paulo do
dc.contributor.authorNajman, Ilana Esquenazi
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-04T17:08:34Z
dc.date.available2022-07-04T17:08:34Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.descriptionp. 571–576.: il. p&b.
dc.description.abstractWe randomly allocated 129 participants with normal eyes to periconal blockade with (n = 69) or without (n = 60) ultrasound guidance before cataract surgery. There was no difference in the rates of complication, 1/69 and 0/60, respectively, p = 1.0. The rate of intraconal needle placement was 1/69 with ultrasound and 12/60 without ultrasound, a relative risk (95% CI) of 0.07 (0.01–0.55), p < 0.0001.
dc.identifier.citationNASCIMENTO JUNIOR, Paulo do; NAJMAN, Ilana Esquenazi. A randomised controlled trial of periconal eye blockade with orwithout ultrasound guidance. Anaesthesia, v. 70, p. 571–576, 2015.
dc.identifier.issn1365-2044
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/8559
dc.publisherAnaesthesiapt_BR
dc.subjectEnsaio Clínico Controlado Aleatóriopt_BR
dc.subjectRandomized Controlled Trialpt_BR
dc.subjectUltrassonografia de Intervençãopt_BR
dc.subjectUltrasonography Interventionalpt_BR
dc.subjectBloqueio Nervosopt_BR
dc.subjectNerve Blockpt_BR
dc.subjectHumanspt_BR
dc.subjectInjeções Intraocularespt_BR
dc.subjectInjections Intraocularpt_BR
dc.subjectAnesthetics Localpt_BR
dc.titleA randomised controlled trial of periconal eye blockade with orwithout ultrasound guidancept_BR

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
A randomised controlled trial of periconal eye blockade with or without ultrasound guidance.pdf
Size:
253.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.6 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: