Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12642
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuerra, Renata Leborato-
dc.contributor.authorHooper, Nancy M.-
dc.contributor.authorBaker, James F.-
dc.contributor.authorAlborz, Roya-
dc.contributor.authorArmstrong, Derek T.-
dc.contributor.authorKiehlbauch, Julia A.-
dc.contributor.authorConde, Marcus Barreto-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-07T19:23:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-07T19:23:46Z-
dc.date.issued2008-11-
dc.identifier.issn1098-660X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12642-
dc.description.abstractWe conducted a decision analysis to assess and compare four algorithms for amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis direct (MTD) testing of respiratory specimens in terms of cost-effectiveness. The most cost-effective strategy was one in which smear-positive specimens but not smear-negative specimens were diluted prior to MTD testing.pt_BR
dc.publisherJournal of Clinical Microbiologypt_BR
dc.subjectAnálise Custo-Benefíciopt_BR
dc.subjectCost-Benefit Analysispt_BR
dc.subjectEstratégias de Saúdept_BR
dc.subjectHealth Strategiespt_BR
dc.subjectMycobacterium tuberculosispt_BR
dc.subjectTuberculose Pulmonarpt_BR
dc.subjectTuberculosis Pulmonarypt_BR
dc.titleCost-Effectiveness of Different Strategies for Amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis Direct Testing for Cases of Pulmonary Tuberculosispt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Pesquisa Populacional



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.