Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17596
Title: Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Authors: Barufaldi, Laura Augusta
Albuquerque, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de
Nascimento, Aline do
Martins, Luís Felipe Leite
Zimmermann, Ivan Ricardo
Souza, Mirian Carvalho de
Keywords: Anticorpos
Antibodies
Anticuerpos
Neoplasias Colorretais
Colorectal Neoplasms
Neoplasias Colorrectales
Análise de Custo-Efetividade
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
Análisis de Costo-Efectividad
Avaliação em Saúde
Health Evaluation
Evaluación en Salud
Metástase Neoplásica
Neoplasm Metastasis
Metástasis de la Neoplasia
Issue Date: Sep-2023
Publisher: Value in health regional issues
Citation: BARUFALDI, Laura Augusta; ALBUQUERQUE, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro de; NASCIMENTO, Aline do; MARTINS, Luís Felipe Leite; ZIMMERMANN, Ivan Ricardo; SOUZA, Mirian Carvalho de. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Value Health Reg Issues, New York, v. 37, p33-40, sep 2023.
Series/Report no.: 37;
Abstract: Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: A partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing thera- peutic options in a 10 years’ time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: The most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71 195.40/ QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 33 threshold. Conclusions: The therapeutic option CT 1 panitumumab 1 bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.
Description: 8 f.
URI: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/17596
Appears in Collections:Relatórios e Materiais de Publicação Científica da DATS

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Barufaldi et al_2023_ ACE_CCRm_ValueinHealth.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.