Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/2022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSouza e Mello, Gustavo Francisco de-
dc.contributor.authorLukashok, Hannah Pitanga-
dc.contributor.authorMeine, Gilmara Coelho-
dc.contributor.authorSmall, Isabele Avila-
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Roberto Luiz Teixeira de-
dc.contributor.authorGuimarães, Denise Peixoto-
dc.contributor.authorMansur, Gilberto Reynaldo-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-15T14:20:49Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-15T14:20:49Z-
dc.date.issued2009-07-
dc.identifier.citationSOUZA E MELLO, Gustavo Francisco de; LUKASHOK, Hannah Pitanga; MEINE, Gilmara Coelho; SMALL, Isabele Ávila; CARVALHO, Roberto Luiz Teixeira de; GUIMARÃES, Denise Peixoto; MANSUR, Gilberto Reynaldo. Outpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patients. Surgical Endoscopy, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 7, p. 1487–1493, jul. 2009.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn1432-2218-
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/2022-
dc.description.abstractBackground Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively simple and safe method of providing access for enteral feeding. The procedure is usually performed in hospitalized patients. The feasibility of PEG as an outpatient procedure has not been well estabilished in the medical literature. The main objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of PEG as an outpatient procedure in a selected group of head and neck cancer patients. Patients and methods In this prospective cohort study, head and neck cancer subjects in good clinical condition were selected and enrolled in a close follow-up protocol of outpatient PEG. The clinical and demographic variables evaluated were age, gender, early complications, and timing of PEG. Results Of a total of 136 PEG patients, 129 (94.8%) were discharged 3 h after the procedure. Three were excluded from the study and four were hospitalized because of moderate abdominal pain. The rate of minor complications was 17.6% (local pain, 7.4%; wound infection, 6.6%; abdominal pain, 2.9%; hematoma, 0.7%). Major complications occurred in 2.2% of the procedures (buried bumper syndrome, 1.5%; early tube displacement, 0.7%). There was no mortality.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherSociety of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)pt_BR
dc.subjectPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomypt_BR
dc.subjectHead and neck cancerpt_BR
dc.subjectOutpatientpt_BR
dc.subjectDay casept_BR
dc.subjectAmbulatorypt_BR
dc.titleOutpatient percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in selected head and neck cancer patientspt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Gustavo Francisco de Souza e Mello

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SouzaEMello2009_Article_OutpatientPercutaneousEndoscop.pdf174.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.