Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/4632
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJanssens, Keegan Peter-
dc.contributor.authorValete, Cristina Ortiz Sobrinho-
dc.contributor.authorSilva, André Ricardo Araújo da-
dc.contributor.authorFerman, Sima Esther-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T13:59:03Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-26T13:59:03Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationJANSSENS, Keegan Peter et al. Evaluation of risk stratification strategies in pediatricpatients with febrile neutropenia. Jornal de Pediatria, v. 97, n. 3, p. 302-308, may/june 2021.-
dc.identifier.issn0021-7557-
dc.identifier.otherhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2020.05.002-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4632-
dc.descriptionp. 302-308.: il. p&b.-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To evaluate the performance of risk stratification protocols for febrile neutropeniaspecific to the pediatric population.Methods: Retrospective study of a cohort of pediatric patients undergoing cancer treatmentwith episodes of neutropenia due to chemotherapy and fever, treated at the emergencydepartment of a tertiary cancer hospital from January 2015 to June 2017. Patients who werebone marrow transplant recipients and patients with neutropenia due to causes other thanchemotherapy were excluded. Six protocols were applied to all patients: Rackoff, Alexander,Santolaya, Rondinelli, Ammann 2003, and Ammann 2010. The following outcomes were assessed:microbiological infection, death, ICU admission, and need for more than two antibiotics. Theperformance of each protocol was analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.Results: This study evaluated 199 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 118 patients. Microbiolog-ical infection was identified in 70 samples from 45 distinct episodes (22.6%), 30 patients usedmore than two antibiotics during treatment (15%), eight required ICU admission (4%), and onepatient died (0.8%). Three protocols achieved high sensitivity indices and NPV regarding theoutcomes of death and ICU admission: Alexander, Rackoff, and Ammann 2010; however, Rack-off showed higher sensitivity (0.82) and NPV (0.9) in relation to the microbiological infectionoutcome.Conclusion: The Rackoff risk rating showed the best performance in relation to microbiologicalinfection, death, and ICU admission, making it eligible for prospective evaluationpt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherJornal de Pediatriapt_BR
dc.subjectNeutropenia Febrilpt_BR
dc.subjectFebrile Neutropeniapt_BR
dc.subjectGuia de Prática Clínicapt_BR
dc.subjectPractice Guidelinept_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasiaspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectCriançapt_BR
dc.subjectChildpt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of risk stratification strategies in pediatricpatients with febrile neutropeniapt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Pediatria



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.