Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/4833
Title: Topotecan Use for Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer at Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA)*
Authors: Melo, Andreia Cristina de
Oliveira, Leandro Nascimento de
Alves, Flávia Vieira Guerra
Mora, Paulo Alexandre Ribeiro
Carmo, Claudio Calazan do
Rodrigues, Angélica Nogueira
Garces, Alvaro Henrique Ingles
Keywords: Topotecan
Neoplasias do Colo do Útero
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Cuidados Paliativos
Palliative Care
Issue Date: 2013
Publisher: Journal of Cancer Therapy
Citation: MELO, Andreia Cristina de et al. Topotecan Use for Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer at Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA). Journal of Cancer Therapy, v. 4, p. 1095-1099, 2013.
Abstract: Cervical cancer represents the third most commonly diagnosed cancer and is an important cause of death for women suffering with malignancies. Patients who are refractory or progressed after first-line palliative treatment have a dismal prognosis and no second-line chemotherapy is considered standard so far. Several agents have been investigated in this setting and topotecan is one of the most characterized. The objective of this study was to evaluate response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of topotecan in second palliative line for cer vical cancer. Methods: An analysis was performed of all patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer treated with topotecan in second palliative line at Brazilian National Cancer Institute, between 2008 and 2010. Results: A total of 73 courses of topotecan were given in the current study (median: 3.5 cycles; range 1 - 6). Anemia was the most fre quent adverse event (grade 2:35%; grade 3:30%). Of the 20 patients evaluable, there were 2 partial responders to the treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 10%; 3 patients (15%) had stable disease as maximum response. The median PFS for the entire group was 2.93 months (95% CI 2.41 - 3.45) and OS was 4.66 months (95% CI 1.21 - 8.11). Conclusion: The limited activity of topotecan schemas in second-line treatment of cervical cancer and the associated overall toxicity may not justify their use in this setting. Patients who progress after first-line treatment may be offered participation in clinical trials, other second-line agents or best supportive care measures.
Description: p. 1095-1099.: tab. p&b.
URI: http://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4833
ISSN: 2151-1942
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Ginecologia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Topotecan Use for Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic.pdf132.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.