Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/4851
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiglio, Alessandra Grasso-
dc.contributor.authorIshikawa, Neli Muraki-
dc.contributor.authorThuler, Luiz Claudio Santos-
dc.contributor.authorBaldotto, Clarissa Seródio da Rocha-
dc.contributor.authorAndrade, Carlos José Coelho de-
dc.contributor.authorDerchain, Sophie Françoise Mauricette-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-13T13:59:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-13T13:59:54Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationGIGLIO, Alessandra Grasso et al. Validation of the Portuguese version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patients. Support Care Cancer, v. 18, p. 481–490, 2010.-
dc.identifier.issn1433-7339-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4851-
dc.descriptionp. 481–490.: tab. p&b.-
dc.description.abstractGoals of work The purpose of this study was to validate the Portuguese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in order to establish its assessment properties, including validity and reliability in a sample of Brazilian cancer patients. Materials and methods Two hundred seventy patients with different types of cancer were included for this study; the mean age was 50.5 years. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility. Construct validity was assessed through convergent validity and discriminant validity. Convergent validity was examined by comparing the FACT-F to the SF-36. Discriminant validity of the FACT-F evaluated the ability of the scale to differentiate defined groups, discriminat ing patients according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and different stages of disease. Main results FACT-F had high internal consistency (Cron bach α coefficient was 0.78 for physical well-being, 0.68 for social/family well-being, 0.75 for emotional well-being, 0.74 for functional well-being, 0.91 for fatigue, and 0.92 for total FACT-F). The range of test–retest intraclass correlation was from 0.72 to 0.91 (p<0.0001). The Pearson product correlation revealed good correlations between the total FACT-F and subscales of the SF-36 in most dimensions, ranging from r=0.51 to r=0.76, except for SF-36 physical (r=0.31). The positive correlations between the SF-36 vitality scale and FACT-F total (r=0.76) and the fatigue subscale (r=0.77) support the convergent validity. Conclusions The Portuguese version of FACT-F is a reliable and valid instrument to assess quality of life and fatigue, representing a valid tool to screen cancer-related fatigue in Brazilian cancer patients-
dc.publisherSupport Care Cancerpt_BR
dc.subjectFadigapt_BR
dc.subjectFatiguept_BR
dc.subjectQualidade de Vidapt_BR
dc.subjectQuality of Lifept_BR
dc.subjectInquéritos e Questionáriospt_BR
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasiaspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectFatiga-
dc.subjectCalidad de Vida-
dc.subjectEncuestas y Cuestionarios-
dc.titleValidation of the Portuguese version of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-F) in Brazilian cancer patientspt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Fisioterapia



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.