Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/5760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Jesse Lopes da-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Fabiana Resende-
dc.contributor.authorMesquita, Guilherme Gomes de-
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Priscila Valverde-
dc.contributor.authorThuler, Luiz Claudio Santos-
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Andreia Cristina de-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-15T16:39:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-15T16:39:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.issn1179-1314-
dc.identifier.otherDoi: 10.2147/BCTT.S287320-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/5760-
dc.description.abstractObjective: This study aimed to investigate the influence of immunohistochemical (IHC) biomarkers in the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and survival outcomes in the subset of locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and Methods: The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), androgen receptor (AR), cytokeratins (CK5/6, CK14 and CK17), Ki67 and p53 immunohistochemistry were evaluated on 171 cases of TNBC submitted to NACT and subsequently to surgery. Intensity and percentage of the expression of these biomarkers were combined to formulate a specific score, that was correlated with prognostic features and assessed for survival outcomes. Results: Most patients had advanced clinical-stage tumors (stage III: 83.6%; cT3/T4: 85.9%; cN1-3: 71.3%). The predominant histological subtype was high-grade (67.3%) and invasive ductal carcinoma (93.6%). The residual cancer burden (RCB) 0–1 corresponded to 28.7% of cases and low-risk lymph node ratio (LNR) represented 77.2%. High Ki67 expression only showed a significant correlation with grade 3 tumors (p = 0.0157). CK5/6 was observed in 16% (27/169), CK14 was positive in 10.1% (17/169), CK17 in 91.1% (153/ 168), p53 in 52.6% (70/133), EGFR in 92.9% (157/169 cases), AR in 13% (22/169) and Ki67 index was scored ≥40% in 57.9% (95/165). No IHC biomarker significantly impacted response or survival. Regarding the analysis of the outcomes of event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS), clinical stage (p = 0.014 and p = 0.042, respectively), RCB (p < 0.0001 and p <0.0001, respectively) and LNR (p <0.0001 and p <0.0001, respectively) showed significant association. Conclusion: No IHC biomarker evaluated showed a significant association with a response or survival outcomes in TNBC patients. Clinical stage, LNR and RCB stood out for strongly influencing survivalpt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherBreast Cancer: Targets and Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativaspt_BR
dc.subjectTriple Negative Breast Neoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectTerapia Neoadjuvantept_BR
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectBiomarcadorespt_BR
dc.subjectBiomarkerspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasia Residualpt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasm Residualpt_BR
dc.subjectRazão entre Linfonodospt_BR
dc.subjectLymph Node Ratiopt_BR
dc.titleTriple-Negative Breast Cancer: Assessing the Role of Immunohistochemical Biomarkers on Neoadjuvant Treatmentpt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigo de Periódicos da Pesquisa Clínica



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.