Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6480
Title: Does the sequence of anthracycline and taxane matter? The neoSAMBA trial
Authors: Bines, José
Small, Isabele Avila
Sarmento, Roberta Monteiro Batista
Kestelman, Fabiola
Silva, Silvania
Rodrigues, Fabiana Resende
Faroni, Lilian Dantonino
Ebecken, Erika Scofano
Bonamino, Martín Hernán
Gonçalves, Aline Coelho
Maroun, Pedro Senise
Millen, Eduardo Camargo
Keywords: Antraciclinas
Anthracyclines
Pacientes
Patients
Análise de Situação
Analysis of Situation
Métodos
Methods
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: The Oncologist
Abstract: Background: Taxanes usually follow anthracyclines in breast cancer neo/adjuvant treatment, likely because of their later introduction into clinical practice. However, there is no biological rationale that justifies this current standard of care. We compared a taxane followed by an anthracycline-based regimen with the reverse sequence in the neoadjuvant setting. Patients and methods: In a randomized, open-label, single-center phase II trial, women with inoperable, locally advanced, HER2-negative breast cancer were stratified by hormone receptor status and randomized to three cycles of docetaxel (T) followed by three cycles of fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) versus three cycles of FAC followed by three cycles of docetaxel. Surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormonal therapy were administered as per local guidelines. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR), and secondary endpoints included toxicity, event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: Treatment sequence did not improve pCR, which was 7% with T-FAC and 3% with FAC-T. However, after a median follow-up of 79 months, the 5-year EFS rate was 75.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4%-87.7%) with T-FAC and 48.2% (95% CI, 37.0%-62.7%) with FAC-T (hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; 95% CI, 0.26-0.81; log-rank p = .0054), and the 5-year OS rate was 89.7% (95% CI, 82.2%-97.8%) with T-FAC and 64.7% (95% CI, 53.6%-78.1%) with FAC-T (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22-0.78; p = .0052). There were no unexpected toxicities. Conclusion: We showed for the first time an improvement in EFS and OS with taxane-first compared with anthracycline-first sequencing chemotherapy in HER2-negative, locally advanced breast cancer. Confirmation of these results may have implications for clinical practice. This trial was registered with Clinicatrials.gov identifier NCT01270373. Implications for practice: The NeoSAMBA trial showed a benefit for taxane-first sequencing chemotherapy consistent with the systematic review of the literature as well as the larger Neo-tAnGo study. Many recent and current ongoing clinical trials have already followed this treatment strategy. As a taxane-before-anthracycline sequence carries neither an incremental cost nor an increased toxicity, and given the available literature on this issue, reinforced that taxane-first regimen can be easily incorporated into daily clinical practice while awaiting confirmation of these findings from larger trials.
Description: 2020;25:758–764
URI: http://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6480
ISSN: 1549-490X
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Enfermagem

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does the sequence of anthracycline and taxane matter The neoSAMBA trial.pdf563.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.