Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCrocamo, Susanne-
dc.contributor.authorBinato, Renata-
dc.contributor.authorPaula, Bruno Henrique Rala de-
dc.contributor.authorVignal, Giselle Maria-
dc.contributor.authorMagalhães, Lídia-
dc.contributor.authorSarmento, Roberta Monteiro Batista-
dc.contributor.authorAccioly, Maria Theresa-
dc.contributor.authorSmall, Isabele Avila-
dc.contributor.authorGioia, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorMoutinho, Pamela-
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Vivianne-
dc.contributor.authorCatein, Karuline-
dc.contributor.authorAbdelhay, Eliana Saul Furquim Werneck-
dc.contributor.authorMaroun, Pedro Senise-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T13:54:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-19T13:54:30Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.issn1758-8359-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6521-
dc.description2019; 11: 1758835919853971-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Preclinical evidence suggests that zoledronic acid (ZOL) works synergistically with chemotherapy by enhancing anti-tumor activity. ZOL blocks the mevalonate pathway and may indirectly interact with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) pathway activation. The clinical efficacy and biological rationale of chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy and ZOL as a part of neoadjuvant therapy has not been previously tested. Patients and methods: We conducted a phase II clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ZOL as part of a neoadjuvant treatment in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC). The protocol consisted of four cycles of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide with ZOL, followed by four cycles of docetaxel with trastuzumab and ZOL prior to surgery. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary endpoints were safety and the identification of clinicopathological characteristics associated with pCR. Results: A total of 71 patients with stage IIA to IIIB BC were included, with 60 eligible for the safety assessment and 58 for the efficacy analysis. Overall, the pCR rate was 42%, with higher rates in hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors (40%), which contrasts with the results of pivotal trials. The most commonly observed grade 3 and 4 events were febrile neutropenia (grade 3, 20%; grade 4, 3%) and diarrhea (grade 3, 12%). Conclusions: The addition of ZOL as a repositioning drug in neoadjuvant treatment was an effective and well-tolerated therapy. This drug combination might overcome endocrine and anti-HER2 resistance. The higher pCR rates in the HR-positive subgroup deserve further translational investigation.-
dc.publisherTher Adv Med Oncol.pt_BR
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasias da Mamapt_BR
dc.subjectGenes erbB-2pt_BR
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasias da Mamapt_BR
dc.subjectNeoadjuvant Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectTerapia Neoadjuvantept_BR
dc.subjectTrastuzumabpt_BR
dc.subjectZoledronic Acidpt_BR
dc.subjectÁcido Zoledrônicopt_BR
dc.titleNeoadjuvant zoledronic acid for HER2- positive breast cancer: the Zo-NAnTax trialpt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Enfermagem

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Neoadjuvant zoledronic acid for HER2-positive breast cancer the Zo-NAnTax trial..pdf176.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.