Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6826
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLima, Lúcio Salustiano de-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Débora Paulino-
dc.contributor.authorCosta Júnior, José Francisco Silva-
dc.contributor.authorPinto, Pâmela Alves-
dc.contributor.authorOmena, Thaís Pionório-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Rejane Medeiros-
dc.contributor.authorKrüger, Marco Antônio Von-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Wagner Coelho de Albuquerque-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-05T14:22:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-05T14:22:59Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationLIMA, Lúcio Salustiano de et al. Evaluation of gloves as a water bag coupling agent for therapeutic ultrasound. Res. Biomed. Eng., v. 33, n. 1, p. 42-49, 2017.-
dc.identifier.issn2446-4740-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6826-
dc.descriptionp. 42-49.: il. color.-
dc.description.abstractTherapeutic ultrasound (TUS) is a widespread modality in physiotherapy, and the water bag technique is a coupling method employed in the presence of anatomical irregularities in the treatment area. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the acoustic attenuation of the water bag and its effectiveness as a TUS coupling agent. Methods: The rated output powers (ROPs) of the TUS equipment were evaluated based on IEC 61689. Then, a radiation force balance was used to measure ROP with and without a water bag (latex and nitrile gloves filled with deionized water) between a TUS transducer and the cone-shaped target of the balance. Each experiment was performed five times for each nominal power (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0 W) and in the following configurations: without the water bag (A), with nitrile gloves and with (B) and without (C) a height controller, and latex gloves with (D) and without (E) height controller. ROPs obtained in different media were compared. Results: The highest relative error of ROP was 16.72% for 0.5 W. Although the power values of the equipment were within the range recommended by IEC, there was a significant difference between the ROP values measured with A and with B, C and D. Conclusion: As intensity differences below 0.5 W/cm2 are considered clinically not relevant, conditions A, B, C, D, or E can be used interchangeably.-
dc.publisherRes. Biomed. Eng.pt_BR
dc.subjectUltrasonicspt_BR
dc.subjectUltrassompt_BR
dc.subjectMethodspt_BR
dc.subjectMétodospt_BR
dc.subjectPotencypt_BR
dc.subjectPotênciapt_BR
dc.subjectAcousticspt_BR
dc.subjectAcústicapt_BR
dc.titleEvaluation of gloves as a water bag coupling agent for therapeutic ultrasoundpt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Fisioterapia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evaluation of gloves as a water bag coupling agent for therapeutic ultrasound..pdf1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.