Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6860
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCamacho, Rolando-
dc.contributor.authorNeves, Diogo-
dc.contributor.authorPiñeros, Marion-
dc.contributor.authorRosenblatt, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorGalán, Yaima-
dc.contributor.authorHawar, Feras-
dc.contributor.authorKilickap, Saadettin-
dc.contributor.authorNaylor, Cláudia-
dc.contributor.authorNicula, Florian-
dc.contributor.authorReno, Jesus-
dc.contributor.authorSirohi, Bhawna-
dc.contributor.authorVidaurre, Tatiana-
dc.contributor.authorZendehdel, Kazem-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-09T17:48:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-09T17:48:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.issn2151-1942-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6860-
dc.description2014, 5, 989-999-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Treatment is an important component of a comprehensive cancer control approach and its outcomes strongly depend on infrastructure, equipment, human and financial resources available. Therefore it is imperative to generate evidence-based tools to assist health policy makers from low resourced countries in planning efficient and equitable treatment services for a defined population based on what it is feasible to these settings. Methods: The intended cancer specific treatment planned and written in the patients’ medical record (treatment prescription) of untreated adult cancer cases (≥18 years of age), excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, was recorded in a chronological way from 1 January 2012 onwards in a group of eight comprehensive cancer centres located in middle income countries and offering the main modalities of cancer treatment (surgery, medical oncology and radiotherapy). Results: A total of 17,713 medical records were reviewed, of which 7106 (54.2%) met the eligibility criteria. Prescription of main cancer treatment modalities were distributed as follows: 57.6% for chemotherapy (n = 4093), 56.8% for surgery (n = 4038), and 46.8% for radiotherapy (n = 3327). There was a predominance of plans consisting of combined treatment modalities over monotherapy (55.2% versus 44.8%). At the time of diagnosis 54.3% of the cancer cases had disease that had spread beyond the primary site, 41.2% were considered as having local disease and in 4.5% of the cases the information on disease extension was unknown. Conclusions: The results obtained should be seen as an approximation of cancer treatment service demand based on what it is currently practiced and therefore feasible in developing countries, particularly in middle income countries.-
dc.publisherJournal of Cancer Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectTherapeuticspt_BR
dc.subjectTerapêuticapt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasmspt_BR
dc.subjectNeoplasiaspt_BR
dc.subjectDeveloping Countriespt_BR
dc.subjectPaíses em Desenvolvimentopt_BR
dc.subjectHealth Services Needs and Demandpt_BR
dc.subjectNecessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúdept_BR
dc.subjectResource Allocationpt_BR
dc.subjectAlocação de Recursospt_BR
dc.subjectObservational Studypt_BR
dc.subjectEstudo Observacionalpt_BR
dc.titlePrescription of cancer treatment modalities in developing countries: Results from a multi-Centre observational study*pt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Enfermagem



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.