Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6941
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrigorovski, Nathalia-
dc.contributor.authorLucena, Evandro-
dc.contributor.authorMattosinho, Clarissa Campolina de Sá-
dc.contributor.authorParareda, Andreu-
dc.contributor.authorFerman, Sima Esther-
dc.contributor.authorCatalá, Jaume-
dc.contributor.authorChantada, Guillermo-
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-16T18:02:10Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-16T18:02:10Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationGRIGOROVSKI, Nathalia et al. Use of intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: results of a survey. International Journal of Ophthalmology, v. 7, n. 4, p. 726-730, aug. 2014.-
dc.identifier.issn2227-4898-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6941-
dc.descriptionp. 726-730.: tab. p&b.-
dc.description.abstractTo obtain baseline knowledge about the current use of intra -arterial chemotherapy (SSOAIC) in centers worldwide. ·METHODS: A survey including questions about the use of SSOAIC was emailed to retinoblastoma experts. ·RESULTS: Seventy-nine (response rate 69.9%) doctors from 63 centers in 35 countries responded. Thirty -one centers from 19 countries use SSOAIC. Twelve performed more than 50 procedures. Melphalan is the most commonly used drug but 15 centers use more than one drug. First line therapy for advanced unilateral disease is the most common use of SSOAIC (74.2%). Centers with larger experience (>50 applications) were less likely using melphalan alone ( =0.06) and significantly more likely using SSOAIC in more situations such as second line in preference to radiotherapy =0.05. Nineteen (61.2% ) stated that SSOAIC improved their results and 21 (77.8%) reported less toxicity compared to other treatments. Three centers reported that SSOAIC did not improve their results. There were regional variations in the use of SSOAIC which is used more frequently as secondary treatment in Europe compared to the USA and Japan. Ten centers identified cost is the major limiting factor for SSOAIC. · CONCLUSION: SSOAIC is used in an increasing number of centers worldwide with regional variations. Centers with more experience in SSOAIC use it in more situations including other drugs than melphalan. The majority of the centers using this technique reported improved results and few complications.-
dc.publisherInternational Journal of Ophthalmologypt_BR
dc.subjectRetinoblastomapt_BR
dc.subjectTratamento Farmacológicopt_BR
dc.subjectDrug Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectInjeções Intra-Arteriaispt_BR
dc.subjectInjections, Intra-Arterialpt_BR
dc.subjectInquéritos e Questionáriospt_BR
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairespt_BR
dc.titleUse of intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma: results of a surveypt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Pediatria

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Use of intra-arterial chemotherapy for retinoblastoma results of a survey..pdf237.27 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.