Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/7247
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCunha, Marcela Souza-
dc.contributor.authorWiegert, Emanuelly Varea Maria-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Larissa Calixto-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Livia Costa de-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-07T10:59:14Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-07T10:59:14Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, Livia Costa de et al. Validation of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment short form as a prognostic tool for patients with incurable cancer. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr., p. 1-8, 2021.-
dc.identifier.issn1941-2444-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7247-
dc.descriptionp. 1–8.: il, p&b,-
dc.description.abstractThe Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a standardized tool for assessing nutrition risk in patients with cancer. The aim of this study was to propose and validate a cutoff point for the PG-SGA SF related to the prognosis of patients with incurable cancer in exclusive palliative care. Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients with incurable cancer at the National Cancer Institute in Brazil. A total sample (n = 2,144) was randomly divided into groups: (1) training (n = 1,072), to determine the most accurate PG-SGA SF cut off, and (2) validation (n = 1,072), to test the predictive accuracy of this cutoff point. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the best cutoff point of the PG-SGA SF related to death. Concordance statistics (C statistic) were used to test the predictive accuracy of the models. Kaplan-Meier curve and the Cox hazard model were used to verify a prognostic value of the cutoff point. Results: PG-SGA SF score ≥15 was found to be the best cutoff based on 90-day mor tality with good accuracy discrimination (C statistic ≥ 0.74). Patients whose PG-SGA SF score was ≥15 had a shorter survival of 32 (interquartile range [IQR], 12–75) vs 83 days (IQR, 31–90) (p-value < .001) and higher risk of death (hazard ratio: 2.20; 95% CI, 1.64–2.95). Conclusions: The proposed PG-SGA SF cutoff score is valid and, alongside its useful ness in nutrition triage, could provide prognostic value for patients with incurable can cer-
dc.publisherJPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr.pt_BR
dc.subjectMalnutritionpt_BR
dc.subjectDesnutriçãopt_BR
dc.subjectNutrition Assessmentpt_BR
dc.subjectAvaliação Nutricionalpt_BR
dc.subjectPalliative Carept_BR
dc.subjectCuidados Paliativospt_BR
dc.subjectPrognosispt_BR
dc.subjectPrognósticopt_BR
dc.subjectValidation Studypt_BR
dc.subjectEstudo de Validaçãopt_BR
dc.titleValidation of the scored patient-generated subjective global assessment short form as a prognostic tool for patients with incurable cancerpt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Nutrição



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.