Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/7295
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Livia Costa de-
dc.contributor.authorRosa, Karla Santos da Costa-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T11:34:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-08T11:34:53Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationOLIVEIRA, Livia Costa de; ROSA, Karla Santos da Costa; SAMPAIO, Simone Garruth dos Santos Machado. Prognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients? Geriatr Gerontol Aging, v. 15, p. 1-7, 2021.-
dc.identifier.issn2447-2123-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/7295-
dc.descriptionp. 1-7.: tab. p&b.-
dc.description.abstractTo compare factors associated with death in adults and older people with advanced cancer who were hospitalized in a palliative care unit (PCU). METHODS: Case-control study with patients (adults vs older people) admitted to a PCU of National Cancer Institute José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Logistic regressions (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [95%CI]) were used to identify factors associated with death. RESULTS: The study included 205 patients, most of which were aged over 60 years old (60.5%). Among the adult patients, a Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2.54 [95%CI 1.11–3.45]) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]) were risk factors for death, while albumin (OR 0.30 [95%CI 0.12–0.78]) was a protective factor. Among older patients, NLR (OR: 1.13 [95%CI 1.02–1.24]), C-reactive protein (CRP) (OR 1.09 [95%CI 1.02–1.17]), modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) 1 and 2 (OR 4.66 [95%CI 1.35–16.06]), CRP-to-albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 1.27 [95%CI 1.03–1.58]), and nutritional risk (OR 1.11 [95%CI 1.03–1.19]) were risk factors, whereas albumin (OR 0.23 [95%CI 0.09–0.57]) was a protective factor against death. CONCLUSIONS: Prognostic factors differed between groups. The NLR was a risk factor, and albumin was a protective factor regarding death in both groups. Additionally, CRP, mGPS, CAR, and nutritional risk were associated with an increased risk of death only among older people.-
dc.publisherGeriatr Gerontol Agingpt_BR
dc.subjectPalliative Carept_BR
dc.subjectCuidados Paliativospt_BR
dc.subjectPrognosispt_BR
dc.subjectPrognósticopt_BR
dc.subjectInflammationpt_BR
dc.subjectInflamaçãopt_BR
dc.subjectNutritional Statuspt_BR
dc.subjectEstado Nutricionalpt_BR
dc.titlePrognostic assessment in palliative cancer care: is there a difference between adult and older patients?pt_BR
dc.title.alternativeAvaliação prognóstica em cuidados paliativos oncológicos: Há diferença entre pacientes adultos e idosos?pt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
dc.description.abstractenComparar os fatores associados ao óbito entre adultos e idosos com câncer avançado internados em uma Unidade de Cuidados Paliativos (UCP). METODOLOGIA: Estudo de caso-controle com pacientes (adultos versus idosos) internados em uma UCP do Instituto Nacional do Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA), no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Regressões logísticas (Odds Ratio [OR] e intervalo de confiança de 95% [IC95%]) foram utilizadas para identificar os fatores associados ao óbito. RESULTADOS: Participaram 205 pacientes, com predomínio de idosos (60,5%). Entre os adultos, o Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 40% (OR 2,54 [IC95% 1,11 – 3,45]) e a razão neutrófilo-linfócito (RNL) (OR 1,09 [IC95% 1,02 – 1,24]) foram fatores de risco, e a albumina (OR 0,30 [IC95% 0,12 – 0,78]) foi fator de proteção para o óbito. Nos idosos, a RNL (OR 1,13 [IC95% 1,02 – 1,24]), a proteína C-reativa (PCR) (OR 1,09 [IC95% 1,02 – 1,17]), o escore prognóstico de Glasgow modificado (EPGm) 1 e 2 (OR 4,66 [IC95% 1,35 – 16,06]), a razão PCR-albumina (RPA) (OR 1,27 [IC95% 1,03 – 1,58]) e o risco nutricional (OR 1,11 [IC95% 1,03 – 1,19]) foram fatores de risco, e a albumina (OR 0,23 [IC95% 0,09 – 0,57]) foi fator de proteção para o óbito. CONCLUSÕES: Os fatores prognósticos diferiram entre os grupos. A funcionalidade e a RNL foram fatores de risco e a albumina foi fator de proteção para o óbito em ambos os grupos. Adicionalmente, somente nos idosos, a PCR, o EPGm, a RPA e o risco nutricional foram associados ao aumento do risco de mortalidade.-
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Nutrição



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.