Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/4792
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Andreia Cristina de-
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Antonio-
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Clymene de Souza Hartung-
dc.contributor.authorMora, Paulo Alexandre Ribeiro-
dc.contributor.authorPaulino, Eduardo-
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Guillermo Coca-
dc.contributor.authorEsteves, Ana Paula Vieira dos Santos-
dc.contributor.authorAmim Junior, Joffre-
dc.contributor.authorElias, Kevin-
dc.contributor.authorHorowitz, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorBerkowitz, Ross Stuart-
dc.contributor.authorRezende Filho, Jorge-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-15T18:36:22Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-15T18:36:22Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationMELO, Andreia Cristina de et al. Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 156, p. 598–605, 2020.-
dc.identifier.issn0090-8258-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4792-
dc.descriptionp. 598–605.: tab. p&b.-
dc.description.abstractTo compare the outcomes of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) treated with standard 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) versus modified regimen. Methods. Retrospective cohort study of patients with low-risk GTN followed at Rio de Janeiro Federal Univer sity, from January/1990-December/2017 with standard 8-day MTX/FA or modified regimen (MTX administered on the 8th day rather than 7th) to avoid treatment on the weekend. Results. From 937 patients with low-risk GTN, 538 were treated with standard MTX/FA and 98 patients re ceived modified regimen. Both groups were comparable in age (p = .749), antecedent pregnancy (p = .221), time to initiate chemotherapy (p = .926), hCG pretreatment level (p = .112) and WHO/FIGO prognostic risk score (p = .723). Patients treated with modified MTX/FA had twice of cases of metastatic lung disease compared with the standard regimen (22.5% vs 10.6%; p = .002). The rate of remission (p = .999), number of cycles to re mission in the first-line (p = .966), chemoresistance (p = .500), time to switch to second-line therapy (p = .176), need for multiagent chemotherapy (p = .084), relapse (p = .122) or death (p = .475) was the same for both MTX/FA regimen. However, although patients receiving modified MTX/FA required a higher total number of remission cycles (6 vs 5 cycles; p = .004) and longer time to remission (19 vs 16 weeks; p b .001) when com pared with the standard regimen, these variables showed no significant differences after multivariate logistic re gression adjusted for lung metastasis. Conclusion. The modified 8-day MTX/FA regimen didn't compromise oncologic outcomes for women with low-risk GTN. This regimen appears to be an acceptable alternative to standard 8-day MTX/FA when treatment on weekend isn't an option.-
dc.publisherGynecologic Oncologypt_BR
dc.subjectEstudos de Casos e Controlespt_BR
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiespt_BR
dc.subjectTratamento Farmacológicopt_BR
dc.subjectDrug Therapypt_BR
dc.subjectOrganismos Geneticamente Modificadospt_BR
dc.subjectOrganisms, Genetically Modifiedpt_BR
dc.titleComparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekendpt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Ginecologia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of treatment for low-risk .pdf593.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.