Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/4792
Title: Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend
Authors: Melo, Andreia Cristina de
Braga, Antonio
Araújo, Clymene de Souza Hartung
Mora, Paulo Alexandre Ribeiro
Paulino, Eduardo
Velarde, Guillermo Coca
Esteves, Ana Paula Vieira dos Santos
Amim Junior, Joffre
Elias, Kevin
Horowitz, Neil
Berkowitz, Ross Stuart
Rezende Filho, Jorge
Keywords: Estudos de Casos e Controles
Case-Control Studies
Tratamento Farmacológico
Drug Therapy
Organismos Geneticamente Modificados
Organisms, Genetically Modified
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Gynecologic Oncology
Citation: MELO, Andreia Cristina de et al. Comparison of treatment for low-risk GTN with standard 8-day MTX/FA regimen versus modified MTX/FA regimen without chemotherapy on the weekend. Gynecologic Oncology, v. 156, p. 598–605, 2020.
Abstract: To compare the outcomes of patients with low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) treated with standard 8-day methotrexate/folinic acid (MTX/FA) versus modified regimen. Methods. Retrospective cohort study of patients with low-risk GTN followed at Rio de Janeiro Federal Univer sity, from January/1990-December/2017 with standard 8-day MTX/FA or modified regimen (MTX administered on the 8th day rather than 7th) to avoid treatment on the weekend. Results. From 937 patients with low-risk GTN, 538 were treated with standard MTX/FA and 98 patients re ceived modified regimen. Both groups were comparable in age (p = .749), antecedent pregnancy (p = .221), time to initiate chemotherapy (p = .926), hCG pretreatment level (p = .112) and WHO/FIGO prognostic risk score (p = .723). Patients treated with modified MTX/FA had twice of cases of metastatic lung disease compared with the standard regimen (22.5% vs 10.6%; p = .002). The rate of remission (p = .999), number of cycles to re mission in the first-line (p = .966), chemoresistance (p = .500), time to switch to second-line therapy (p = .176), need for multiagent chemotherapy (p = .084), relapse (p = .122) or death (p = .475) was the same for both MTX/FA regimen. However, although patients receiving modified MTX/FA required a higher total number of remission cycles (6 vs 5 cycles; p = .004) and longer time to remission (19 vs 16 weeks; p b .001) when com pared with the standard regimen, these variables showed no significant differences after multivariate logistic re gression adjusted for lung metastasis. Conclusion. The modified 8-day MTX/FA regimen didn't compromise oncologic outcomes for women with low-risk GTN. This regimen appears to be an acceptable alternative to standard 8-day MTX/FA when treatment on weekend isn't an option.
Description: p. 598–605.: tab. p&b.
URI: http://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/4792
ISSN: 0090-8258
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da área de Ginecologia

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Comparison of treatment for low-risk .pdf593.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.