Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ninho.inca.gov.br/jspui/handle/123456789/6537
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBraz-Silva, Paulo Henrique-
dc.contributor.authorMamana, Ana Carolina-
dc.contributor.authorRomano, Camila Malta-
dc.contributor.authorFelix, Alvina Clara-
dc.contributor.authorPaula, Anderson Vicente de-
dc.contributor.authorFereira, Noeli E.-
dc.contributor.authorBuss, Lewis Fletcher-
dc.contributor.authorTozetto-Mendoza, Tania Regina-
dc.contributor.authorLeal, Fabio Eudes-
dc.contributor.authorRegina M. Z. Grespan-
dc.contributor.authorBizário, João Carlos da Silva-
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Andrea B. C.-
dc.contributor.authorSapkota, Dipak-
dc.contributor.authorGiannecchini, Simone-
dc.contributor.authorTo, Kelvin K.-
dc.contributor.authorDoglio, Alain-
dc.contributor.authorCorrêa, Maria Cássia Jacintho Mendes-
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T18:11:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-19T18:11:54Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn2000-2297-
dc.identifier.other10.1080/20002297.2020.1858002-
dc.identifier.urihttp://sr-vmlxaph03:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/6537-
dc.description.abstractBackground: SARS-CoV-2 quickly spreads in the worldwide population, imposing social restrictions to control the infection, being the massive testing another essential strategy to break the chain of transmission. Aim: To compare the performance of at-home self-collected samples – saliva and combined nasal-oropharyngeal swabs (NOP) – for SARS-CoV-2 detection in a telemedicine platform for COVID-19 surveillance. Material and methods: We analyzed 201 patients who met the criteria of suspected COVID- 19. NOP sampling was combined (nostrils and oropharynx) and saliva collected using a cotton pad device. Detection of SARS-COV-2 was performed by using the Altona RealStar® SARS-CoV -2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0. Results: There was an overall significant agreement (κ coefficient value of 0.58) between saliva and NOP. Considering results in either sample, 70 patients positive for SARS-CoV-2 were identified, with 52/70 being positive in NOP and 55/70 in saliva. This corresponds to sensitiv- ities of 74.2% (95% CI; 63.7% to 83.1%) for NOP and 78.6% (95% CI; 67.6% to 86.6%) for saliva. Conclusion: Our data show the feasibility of using at-home self-collected samples (especially saliva), as an adequate alternative for SARS-CoV-2 detection. This new approach of testing can be useful to develop strategies for COVID-19 surveillance and for guiding public health decisions.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherJournal of Oral Microbiologypt_BR
dc.subjectSalivapt_BR
dc.subjectCoronaviruspt_BR
dc.subjectInfection Controlpt_BR
dc.subjectControle de Infecçõespt_BR
dc.subjectControl de Infeccionespt_BR
dc.subjectPrimary Health Carept_BR
dc.subjectAtenção Primária à Saúdept_BR
dc.subjectAtención Primaria de Saludpt_BR
dc.subjectTelemedicinept_BR
dc.subjectTelemedicinapt_BR
dc.subject.otherPCRen
dc.titlePerformance of at-home self-collected saliva and nasal-oropharyngeal swabs in the surveillance of COVID-19pt_BR
dc.TypeArticlept_BR
Appears in Collections:Artigos de Periódicos da Pesquisa Experimental e Translacional



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.